Last ned (Gratis)

Abstrakt

Truly smart systems need to interface with the behaviour of human and
non human actors in their surroundings. Systems with such interfaces
could prove beneficial in supporting those with non standard communication
practices, the elderly living alone, people with disabilities, and
many others. While the benefits are clear, the means of achieving true
behavioural interfaces are yet unclear. In this paper we outline how
semiotics helps us to understand behaviour. We show how such an approach
may be put to use in modelling the intention to walk through
a door. We begin by outlining the semiotic approach and then discuss
the behaviours which need to be described to model intention. We also
discuss how this varies according to context and suggest the potential
for a more general model of behaviour.

Referanser

[1] Mark Weiser. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, pages
94–104, September 1991.
[2] Uwe Hansmann, Lothar Merk, Martin S. Nicklous, and Thomas Stober.
Pervasive Computing: The Mobile World. Springer Professional Computing,
2003.
[3] K. Ducatel, M. Bogdanowicz, F. Scapolo, J. Leijten, and J-C. Burgelman.
ISTAG scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010. Technical report, IST
Advisory Group, 2001.
[4] Adam Greenfield. Everyware: The Dawning Age of Ubiquitous Computing
(Voices That Matter). New Riders Publishing, 2006.
[5] Anders Kofod-Petersen and Agnar Aamodt. Contextualised ambient intelligence
through case-based reasoning. In T. R. Roth-Berghofer, Mehmet H.
G¨oker, and H. Altay G¨uvenir, editors, Proceedings of the Eighth European
Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR 2006), volume 4106 of Lecture
Notes in Computer Science, pages 211–225, ¨ Ol¨udeniz, Turkey, September 2006.
Springer Verlag.
[6] Stephen S. Yau, Yu Wang, and Fariaz Karim. Development of situationaware
application software for ubiquitous computing environments. In
29th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference
(COMPSAC’02), volume 1, pages 107–112, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2002.
IEEE Computer Society.
[7] Mica R. Endsley, Betty Bolt´e, and Debra G. Jones. Designing for Situation
Awareness: An Approach to User-Centered Design. Taylor & Francis, 2003.
[8] E. H. L. Aarts and J. L. Encarna¸c˜ao, editors. True Visions: The Emergence of
Ambient Intelligence. Springer, 2006.
[9] T. Deacon. The Symbolic Species. The Co-evolution of Language and the
Human Brain. Penguin, 1997.
[10] G. Bateson. A theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an Ecology of Mind,
Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry and Epistemology. Paladin, 1972.
[11] M. A. K. Halliday. Explorations in the Function of Language. Edward Arnold,
1973.
[12] M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan. Language, Context and Text: Aspects of
Language in a socio-semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press, 1985.
[13] Michael A.K. Halliday and Ruqaiya Hasan. Language, Context, and Text:
aspects of language in a scoial-semiotic perspective. Deakin University Press,
Geelong, Australia, 1985.
[14] M. A. K. Halliday. Text as semantic choice in social contexts. In T. A. van
Djik and J. S. Petofi, editors, Grammars and Descriptions. Walter de Gruyter,
1979.
Closed Doors { Modelling Intention in Behavioural Interfaces 101
i
i
i
i
[15] A Firkins. The semantics of challenging behavior. In Australian Group on
Severe Communication Impairment Conference, Adelaide, 2001.
[16] R. Martinec. Interpersonal resources in action. Semiotica, (135):117–145, 2001.
[17] A. Moore. Surgical teams in action: a contextually sensitive approach to
modelling body alignment and interpersonal engagement. In A. Baldry and
E. Montagna, editors, Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Multimodality: Theory
and Practice, Campobasso, Italy, 2008. Palladino.
[18] R. Hasan. Dynamic view of context in language. In C. Cloran, D. Butt, and
G. Williams, editors, Ways of Saying Ways of Speaking, Open Linguistic Series.
Casell, 1996.
[19] Emanuel A. Schegloff. Whose text? whose context? Discourse & Society,
8(2):165–187, 1997.
[20] Emanuel A. Schegloff. On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew and
J. Heritage, editors, Talk at Work. Interaction in Institutional Settings, pages
101–134. Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[21] Erving Goffman. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. University of
Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre. Anchor Books edition 1959, 1956.
[22] Tim Ingold and Jo Lee Vergunst, editors. Ways of walking: ethnography and
practice on foot. Ashgate Publishing, 2008.