Can computerized physician order entry systems increase security?
| Forfattere | Henriette Mabeck |
| Publikasjon | Scandinavian Conference on Health Informatics |
| Publiseringsår | 2010 |
| Sidetall intervall | 29-33 |
| Nøkkelord | Computerized physician order entry system, CPOE, Socio technical studies, medical errors, implementation, security and quality in health care |
| ISBN/ISBN2 | 978-82-519-2606-5/ |
| Sjanger | Helse |
| Kategori | Helse |
| Redaktør | Ann Bygholm, Pia Elberg, Ole Hejlesen |
| Utgiver | Tapir Akademisk Forlag |
| Adresse utgiver | Tapir Akademisk Forlag Nardoveien 12, Trondheim |
| Språk | English |
Abstrakt
When computerized physician order entry systems (CPOE) are introduced there is a general expectation that the system can reduce medical errors and make work flow more efficient. This study asks why potential security problems continue despite intentions in CPOE. The study show how the organisation focus on implementation and forget to analyse potential adverse drug effects, and how hidden elements has influence on work flow and security.Linear models are selected as basis, but the linearity doesn’t reflect real life conditions. The article argue that diversity and local evolution influences how users use CPOE in practise, CPOE can’t determine users work flow, users act according to values, practical factors, existing routines etc. Physical elements, culture, routines and habits affect CPOE. Therefore it is necessary to continue to study details in CPOE used in daily work.
The conclusion is there is a need for more socio technical studies that can enlighten how CPOE work in medical practise and someone who has responsibility to secure focus on improving security and efficiency.
Referanser
Sundhedsstyrelsen. Temarapport 2005: Medicinering. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2005.Sundhedsstyrelsen. Årsrapport 2006 - DPSD Dansk Patientsikkerhedsdatabase. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2007.
Sundhedsministeriet. National strategi for IT i sygehusvæsenet 2000-2002. København: Sundhedsministeriet; 2000.
Dansk Selskab for Patientsikkerhed, Dansk Lægemiddel Information A/S. Ny rapport viser vejen til færre medicineringsfejl. http://www patientsikkerhed dk 2005 April 11;Available from: URL: http://www.patientsikkerhed.dk/admin/media/doc/5dd12e199a1fb752d8a364acc919f2c3.doc
Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in health care: the nature of patient care information system- related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004 March;11(2):104-12.
Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL, Overhage JM, Shabot MM, Sheridan T. Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2001 July;8(4):299- 308. Figure 4: Elements from medication process Figure 5: Categorising of elements in medication process
Ash JS, Sittig DF, Dykstra RH, Guappone K, Carpenter JD, Seshadri V. Categorizing the unintended sociotechnical consequences of computerized provider order entry. Int J Med Inform 2006 June 20;76(Suppl 1):S21-7.
Campbell EM, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences related to computerized provider order entry. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006 September; 13(5):547-56.
Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, Clark RS, Watson RS, Nguyen TC, Bayir H, Orr RA. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics 2005 December; 116(6):1506-12.
Suchman L. Making work visible. Communications of the ACM 1995;38(9):56-64.
Suchman L. Supporting articulation work. In: Kling R, editor. Computerization and controversy - value conflicts and social choices. 2 ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p. 407-25.
Spradley JP. Participant observation. New York: Wadsworth; 1980.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2 ed. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications; 1998.
Nardi B, O´Day VL. Information Ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press; 1999.
Berg M, Aarts J, Van der Lei J. ICT in health care: Sociotechnical approaches. Methods Inf Med 2003;42(4):297-301.
Mol A, Berg M. Differences in Medicine: An Introduction. In: Mol A, Berg M, editors. Differences in Medicin - unraveling practices, techiques, and bodies.Durham and London: Duke University Press; 1998. p. 1-12.
Mol A. The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. 2 ed. Durham: Duke University Press; 2005.
Timmermans s, Berg M. The practice of medical technology. Sociology of Health & Illness 2005;25(3):97-114.
Nohr C. [Socio-technical studies may enhance our understanding of complex work practices]. Ugeskr Laeger 2010 March 8;172(10):787-90.
Århus Amt. Elektronisk patientjournal i Århus Amt - rapport fra EPJ-projektgruppen februar 1999 (\"Den blå rapport\"). Århus: Århus Amt; 1999.
Flyvbjerg B. Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher\'s Praxis Story. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2002;21(4):353-66.
Forrige artikkel Neste artikkel



