Last ned (Gratis)

Abstrakt

Use cases is a popular representation format for functional requirements, and misuse cases
have similarly been explored for security and safety threats and requirements implied by these.
These diagrams are simple and do not show much information, and for instance the location of
the user while performing various tasks is typically not included. However, in mobile information
systems such information would be highly relevant. This paper examines alternatives for
including location in use and misuse case diagrams, to see if this would better illustrate the
mobile aspects of the system and security challenges particularly related to that.

Referanser

Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Cockburn, A. (2001). Writing Effective Use Cases. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Dourish, P. (2006). Re-space-ing place: \"place\" and \"space\" ten years on, Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 299-308). Banff, Alberta, Canada: ACM.

Esbjörnsson, M. (2001). Work in Motion: Interpretation of Defects along the Roads, 24th information systems research seminar in Scandinavia. Bergen, Norway.

Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., & Sindre, G. (2010). Adapting UML Activity Diagrams for Mobile Work Process Modelling: Experimental Comparison of Two Notation Alternatives. In S. Hoppenbrouwers, P. v. Bommel, S. Overbeek & E. Proper (Eds.), Proc. 3rd IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modelling (PoEM 2010) (pp. 145-161). Delft, the Netherlands: Springer.

Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., & Sindre, G. (2011a). Adapted UML Activity Diagrams for Mobile Work Processes: Experimental comparison of colour and pattern fills. In T. Halpin (Ed.), Proc. 16th International Conference on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD\'11). London, UK: Springer.

Gopalakrishnan, S., Krogstie, J., & Sindre, G. (2011b). Extending Use and Misuse Case Diagrams to Capture Multi-Channel Information Systems. In A. A. Manaf (Ed.), Proceedings International Conference on Informatics Engineering & Information Science (ICIEIS2011), Part I (Vol. 251, pp. 355-369): Springer CCIS.

Gopalakrishnan, S., & Sindre, G. (2010). A study on Mobile Requirements Elicitation by Boilerplate Requirements Specification Language. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business, 613-623. Gopalakrishnan, S., & Sindre, G. (2011). Diagram Notations for Mobile Work Processes. In P. Johannesson & A. L. Opdahl (Eds.), The 4th IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference on the Practice of Enterprise Modelling (PoEM\'11). Oslo, Norway: Springer LNBIP.

Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: the roles of place and space in collaborative systems, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 67-76). Boston, Massachusetts, United States: ACM.

Jacobson, I., Christerson, M., Jonsson, P., & Overgaard, G. (1992). Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Kristoffersen, S., & Ljungberg, F. (1999). Mobile Use of IT, 22nd Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia. Jyväskylä, Finland.

Krogstie, J. (1999). Using Quality Function Deployment in Software Requirements Specification, Fifth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundations for Software Quality (REFSQ\'99). Heidelberg, Germany. Krogstie, J. (2003). Evaluating UML Using a Generic Quality Framework. In L. Favre (Ed.), UML and the Unified Process (pp. 1-22). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Krogstie, J. (2008). Integrated goal, data and process modelling: from TEMPORA to model-generated work-places. . In P. Johannesson & E. Söderström (Eds.), Information systems engineering: from data analysis to process networks (pp. 43-65). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Krogstie, J., & Arnesen, S. d. F. (2004). Assessing Enterprise Modelling Languages using a Generic Quality Framework. In J. Krogstie, K. Siau & T. Halpin (Eds.), Information Modelling Methods and Methodologies (pp. 63-79). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Krogstie, J., Brandtzæg, P. B., Heim, J., & Opdahl, A. L. (2003). Usable M-Commerce Systems: The Need of Model-Based Approaches. In E.-P. Lim & K. Siau (Eds.), Advances in Mobile Commerce Technologies (pp. 190-204). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

Lin, Y., Sampson, J., Hakkarainen, S., & Ding, H. (2004). An evaluation of UML and OWL using a semiotic quality framework. In K. Siau (Ed.), Advanced Topics in Database Research (Vol. 4, pp. 178-200). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Luff, P., & Heath, C. (1998). Mobility in collaboration, ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 305- 314). Seattle, Washington, United States: ACM.

Moody, D. L. (2009). The \"Physics\" of Notations: Toward a Scientific Basis for Constructing Visual Notations in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 35, 756-779.

Nossum, A., & Krogstie, J. (2009). Integrated Quality of Models and Quality of Maps. In T. Halpin, J. Krogstie, S. Nurcan, E. Proper, R. Schmidt, P. Soffer & R. Ukor (Eds.), Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling (Vol. 29, pp. 264-276): Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Nysetvold, A. G., & Krogstie, J. (2006). Assessing Business Process Modelling Languages Using a Generic Quality Framework. In K. Siau (Ed.), Advanced Topics in Database Research (Vol. 5, pp. 79-93). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

Recker, J., Rosemann, M., & Krogstie, J. (2007). Ontology- Versus Pattern-Based Evaluation of Process Modeling Languages: A Comparison. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20, 774-799.

Shneiderman, B. (1992). Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.

Sindre, G., & Opdahl, A. L. (2005). Eliciting Security Requirements with Misuse Cases. Requirements Engineering, 10(1), 34-44.

Spence, R. (2000). Information Visualization: Design for Interaction. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.: Prentice-Hall. Wahl, T., & Sindre, G. (2006). An Analytical Evaluation of BPMN Using a Semiotic Quality Framework. In K. Siau (Ed.), Advanced Topics in Database Research, Volume 5 (pp. 94-105): IGI Global.

Walderhaug, S., Stav, E., & Mikalsen, M. (2008). Experiences from Model-Driven Development of Homecare Services: UML Profiles and Domain Models. In M. R. V. Chaudron (Ed.), Model-Based Design of Trustworthy Health Information Systems (MOTHIS), workshop at MODELS\'08 (Vol. 5421, pp. 199-212). Toulouse, France: Springer LNCS.

Wand, Y., & Weber, R. A. (1993). On the Ontological Expressiveness of Information Systems Analysis and Design Grammars. Journal of Information Systems.

Ware, C. (2000). Information Visualization. Waltham, Massachussets: Morgan Kaufmann.

Weidenhaupt, K., Pohl, K., Jarke, M., & Haumer, P.(1998). Scenario Usage in System Development: A Report on Current Practice. IEEE Software, 15(2), 34-45.




Neste artikkel